Close Menu
  • Home
  • Finance News
  • Personal Finance
  • Investing
  • Cards
    • Credit Cards
    • Debit
  • Insurance
  • Loans
  • Mortgage
  • More
    • Save Money
    • Banking
    • Taxes
    • Crime
What's Hot

EarnIn launches Early Pay for paychecks | PaymentsSource

March 21, 2025

How to Retire Like an Adult: An 11-Point Checklist for Responsible Freedom

March 21, 2025

How Trump’s Chaos Is Exacerbating The Financial Woes Of Colleges

March 21, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
InCapital Direct
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Finance News
  • Personal Finance
  • Investing
  • Cards
    • Credit Cards
    • Debit
  • Insurance
  • Loans
  • Mortgage
  • More
    • Save Money
    • Banking
    • Taxes
    • Crime
InCapital Direct
Home»Banking»Regulators should stop trying to ‘whack’ so-called junk fees
Banking

Regulators should stop trying to ‘whack’ so-called junk fees

November 13, 2024No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
Regulators should stop trying to ‘whack’ so-called junk fees
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The term “junk fees” has proliferated in press articles over the last year or two. It is time to dispel the confusion surrounding this politically charged label, which often applies to the various fees banks find necessary to recoup current or expected losses. These fees, often characterized as excessive by consumer advocates, are actually a crucial part of a bank’s revenue stream and are necessary to cover the costs of providing credit. 

Just as in the arcade game Whac-A-Mole, when regulators “whack” a fee, it makes other modes of recoupment pop up: higher interest rates or other fees, restricting credit, etc. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for policymakers.

The latest “junk fees” rage is related to late fees. Recent articles in the press have highlighted a surge in credit card interest rates and fees, such as those for paper statements, allegedly to offset losses anticipated from a potential unblocking of a court-blocked $8 cap on late fees proposed by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. But how does one determine if the increases in interest rates and fees are compensatory to offset the losses resulting from the cap imposition? The answer lies in applying the Current Expected Credit Loss, or CECL, accounting standard.

But first, it’s crucial to understand that the recent interest rate hikes are not a strategy for additional profits. In a fiercely competitive landscape, banks are compelled to raise credit card interest rates and charges other than late fees to offset the capping of fees charged upon late payments. This competitive pressure also ensures that banks will not increase interest rates solely to make extra profits. For instance, if Bank A were to increase the interest rate to gain an extra return rather than offset actual incremental costs, Bank B would likely keep their lower interest rates to attract more customers, taking market share from Bank A. Competitive markets help ensure this equilibrium.

See also  8 banks that reimburse ATM fees

Let’s consider the late fees, specifically. These fees have a dual purpose: They deter late payments, and they compensate for the incremental cost imposed by the occurrence of a late payment. Except for instances where borrowers forget to pay on time, such incremental cost represents the increase in default risk implied by late payment. Signaling a relative inability to pay on time, paying late broadcasts heightened default risk, ultimately resulting in charge-offs — actual loss of principal and interest. In other words, late payments are harbingers of losses that the imposition of late fees must recoup. Depriving a bank from recouping such losses compels it to revert to other means of recapture through increases in interest rates charged on the loan or the imposition of other unregulated fees.

The CECL accounting standard, promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, came into effect in 2020. It offers a valuable means of measurement in this scenario. By utilizing CECL, banks can quantify the increase in the default risk. Under the CECL model, banks must provide for all losses expected over the loan’s entire life to be reflected as a cost in their income statements. Significantly, for each subsequent period, the bank must update its projections of remaining lifetime loan losses based on fresh information about the loan performance and changes in economic forecasts and adjust its loan loss provision accordingly by increasing or decreasing it.

Ponder what late payments can imply. For example, a diminished ability to pay telegraphed by late payments causes a downward revision in the forecasted cash collections of principal and interest due on a loan. The present value of such a forecasted decrease in expected cash collections constitutes the required uptick in the CECL loss provision. This uptick establishes the amount that needs to be recovered through the late fee imposed upon the late payment. The capping of late fees deprives the bank of recouping its incremental loss of principal and interest on its loans. The bank would then need to recoup the cap-caused shortfall by hiking up the interest rate or imposing other unregulated fees, such as annual or balance transfer fees.

See also  Oklahoma bank fails amid claims of 'false and deceptive bank records'

While estimating the decrease in future cash collections upon experiencing a late payment is complex, banks can engender a reasonable estimate by analyzing detailed historical data on the incidence of diminished cash collections associated with late payments. Competitive pressures will push banks to make increasingly accurate forecasts of the cash shortfalls implied by late payments. CECL will help pave the way.

Source link

fees junk regulators socalled Stop whack
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Previous ArticleWhat Another Trump Term Means for the Market
Next Article Stocks making the biggest moves premarket: CAVA, SPOT, RKLB

Related Posts

EarnIn launches Early Pay for paychecks | PaymentsSource

March 21, 2025

Available balance vs. current balance: What’s the difference?

March 21, 2025

Fed’s Waller sees ‘no evidence’ of reserve shortage

March 21, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

The biggest investor self-defeating mistakes in trying to beat market

February 16, 2025

The top 6 buy now, pay later apps of 2025

January 11, 2025

India launches .bank.in domain to fight fraud

February 10, 2025
Ads Banner

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to Get the Latest Financial Tips and Insights Delivered to Your Inbox!

Stay informed with our finance blog! Get expert insights, money management tips, investment strategies, and the latest financial news to help you make smart financial decisions.

We're social. Connect with us:

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
Top Insights

EarnIn launches Early Pay for paychecks | PaymentsSource

March 21, 2025

How to Retire Like an Adult: An 11-Point Checklist for Responsible Freedom

March 21, 2025

How Trump’s Chaos Is Exacerbating The Financial Woes Of Colleges

March 21, 2025
Get Informed

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to Get the Latest Financial Tips and Insights Delivered to Your Inbox!

© 2025 incapitaldirect.com - All rights reserved.
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.